Skip to content1 weekStart with a one-week proof on one processStart with a one-week proof →Watch the latest Stanford AI & Investment session →
7 cases
IT and managed-services network · Canada · 42 locations
Started with a one-week proof
- Clients with proven protection66%→ to 100%
- Security questionnaires6 h→ to 45 min
- New-location onboarding6 weeks→ to 2 weeks
11 national sources and 42 local setups in one model, in English and French, hosted in Canada. Kept as a managed service.
From the network’s own ticketing, monitoring and billing records; baseline Nov 2025, readings at day 90. Value figures not claimed.
Industrial manufacturer · Istanbul · explosion-protected equipment · ~85 people
Started with a one-week proof
- On-time delivery75%→ to 95%
- Audit evidence15 working days→ to 1 day
- Danger-zone entries per 1,000 hours4.8→ to 0.9
- Major audit findings3→ to 0
12 sources, three years of paper forms and vision at six machines, all on the client’s own servers. Kept as a managed service.
Measured by the client: May–Oct 2026 vs the 12 months to Dec 2025. Safety against a four-week shadow baseline.
Lubricants and greases manufacturer · UAE, German roots · ~300 people
Started with a one-week proof
- Export orders, request to dispatch14 days→ to 8 days
- Export shipments with a document error11%→ to 2%
- Batches needing a re-test or re-blend6.5%→ to 2%
A 12-week due diligence of the path from distributor order to dispatch: 24 findings, each with an owner. The company’s own teams built the controls.
Measured by Mirr Oils’ finance lead and quality manager: Feb–Jul 2026 vs the 12 months to Sep 2025.
Electrical and Ex-proof equipment supplier · Istanbul and Balıkesir · ~50 people
Started with a one-week proof
- Orders delivered on the promised date68%→ to 90%
- Dispatches with a complete documentation file62%→ to 96%
- Quote to order9 days→ to 4 days
A two-week readiness check, then a 12-week due diligence: 21 findings, each with an owner. Welektrik’s own teams built the controls.
Measured by Welektrik’s finance lead: Jan–Apr 2026 vs the 12 months to Sep 2025.
Technology reseller and IoT designer · Frankfurt · ~50 people
Started with a one-week proof
- Export orders screened before the quote40%→ to 100%
- Vendor deals registered before quotation55%→ to 95%
- Delivery to invoice21 days→ to 7 days
One 8-week due diligence: 24 findings, each with a control specification. The client’s own teams built the controls into their CRM.
Measured by the client’s finance lead: Mar–Sep 2026 vs the 12 months to Nov 2025.
Dental education and advanced-therapeutics consulting · Texas · ~20 people
Started with a one-week proof
- Faculty profiles linked to a course or event3 of 23→ to 23 of 23 (target)
- Published home-page figures traced to records0 of 4→ to 4 of 4 (target)
- RisksUnranked→ to 18 findings ranked, with owners
One ten-week due diligence across 8 sources, both divisions mapped in parallel. Our first engagement, and the method every later one has used.
Found in the due diligence, October–December 2025. Targets set in the report; delivery is the company’s and is not claimed.
Software provider for capital projects · Europe · ~100 people
Started with a one-week proof
- Time to go-live12 weeks→ to 6 weeks
- Projects within budget60%→ to 86%
- Audit evidence3 weeks→ to 1 day
One 12-week due diligence across 11 systems, including recorded workshops. The client’s teams now run the controls.
Measured by the client: Jul–Oct 2026 vs the 12 months to Mar 2026; a cohort of 7 new projects.
